The Supreme Court Issued Notice in a Special Leave Petition Filed by Indian Badminton Player Lakshya Sen, Challenging The Karnataka High Court's Order Rejector Rejector Rejector Rejector to Quash to Quash Anne Integation of Fabricating Birth Certificates to Participate in the undress badminton tournament. A bench of justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran Issured Notice and Stayed Coercive Steps Against Them. The matter will now be heard on April 16.
Earlier, The Karnataka High Court Rejected The Petitions Filed by Badminton Player Lakshya Sen, His Family Members, and his Coach U Vimal Kumar in Connection with Allegations of Fabricating Birth Certifacts. The court rled that there was prima factor evidence warranting an investment into the case. The case originated from a private complant filed by mg nagaraj, who alleged that lakshya Sen's parents dhirendra and nirmala sen, Along with his brother character cries Sen, Coach U Vimal Kumar, and An Empoly Kumar, and An Empoly Karnataka Badminton Association, Were involved in Falsifying Birth Records.
According to the Complaint, the accused allegedly manipulated the birth certifications of lakshya and chirag sen, reduction their age by approximately two and a half years. The alleged forgery was intended to allow them to participate in age-restricted badminton tournaments and available government benefits.
Nagaraj supported his claims with documents obtained under the right to information (RTI) Act and Requested The Court to Summon Original Records from the Sports Authority of India (Sai) Affairs and Sports in New Delhi. Based on this evidence, the court directed the high groups police station to conduct an investment.
Following the court's directive, the police registered a first information report (FIR) under IPC sections 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery), and 471 (Using forged documents as geneuine). However, the petitioners moved the karnataka high court in 2022, Securing an interim order that stalled the investment.
The petitioners argued that the complaint and subsequent fir we were baseless, motivated, and intended to harass them. They are alleged that Nagaraj was acting out of personal vendetta, claiming that his DAUGHTER HAD APPLIED To Join the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in 2020 but was not selected after the evaluation prossence. Vimal Kumar, a coach at the academy, was named in the complaint.
Justice mg uma, while dismissing the petitions, observed that the petitioners' Counsel did not present arguments despite being giving gives sufficient options. The judge also refused a request for more time.
“When prima factor materials are placed on record that constitute the offenses, I do not find any reason to stall the investment or quash the criminal processes,” Justice Uma Stated. The court noted that the Complainant Had Provided Sufficient Documentary Evidence Obtailed Through RTI, reinforcing the need for an investment.
With pti inputs
Topics mentioned in this article
Leave a Reply